Skip to main content

Committee on the Judiciary

The U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary, also known as the House Judiciary Committee, is a standing committee of the U.S. House of Representatives. The committee has jurisdiction over a wide range of issues related to the administration of justice, including:

  • Federal courts and judicial procedures
  • Civil rights and civil liberties
  • Constitutional amendments
  • Immigration and nationality
  • Monopolies and antitrust issues
  • Crime control and law enforcement
  • Drug policy

The committee is responsible for considering and reporting legislation related to these areas, as well as conducting oversight of the executive branch and the federal judiciary. The committee also has the authority to impeach federal officials, including the President, and to consider articles of impeachment.

The House Judiciary Committee is chaired by the Speaker of the House or, in the Speaker's absence, the Majority Leader. The ranking minority member is the Minority Leader or, in the Minority Leader's absence, the Minority Whip. The committee is composed of members of the U.S. House of Representatives, with each state represented by at least one member.

February 25, 2013

Washington, D.C. - On Wednesday at 10:00 a.m., the House Judiciary Committee will hold a full Committee hearing on “Drones and the War On Terror: When Can the U.S. Target Alleged American Terrorists Overseas?”  The hearing will focus on the legal issues involved in the targeted killing of American citizens overseas by the Obama administration and how best to take due process of law into account in a battlefield situation where the enemy may be a U.S.

Date:
Location:
2141 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING

February 5, 2013

Chairman Goodlatte: Good morning.  Today, we hold the first hearing of the Judiciary Committee in the 113th Congress. 

This year, Congress will engage in a momentous debate on immigration.  This will be a massive undertaking with significant implications for the future direction of our nation. As such, we must move forward methodically and evaluate this issue in stages, taking care to fully vet the pros and cons of each piece.