Statement for the Committee on the Judiciary

U.S. House of Representatives

on

Election Administration Reform

by

Lloyd Leonard

Legislative Director

The League of Women Voters of the United States

December 5, 2001

 

 

 

Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, I am Lloyd Leonard, legislative director for the League of Women Voters of the United States.

 

I am pleased to have the opportunity today to express the League's strong support for speedy enactment of election reform legislation. 

 

The League of Women Voters of the United States is a nonpartisan citizen organization with more than 125,00 members and supporters in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands.  For more than 80 years, Leagues across the country have worked to educate the electorate, register voters and make government at all levels more accessible and responsive to citizens.  We believe that voting is the most important  expression of a citizen’s participation in government.. 

 

Mr. Chairman, many Americans were shocked by the problems in election administration that were exposed by the 2000 election.  We in the League of Women Voters, however, were not surprised.  Unfortunately, the kinds of problems we saw in 2000 are not unusual.  They represent the harvest from years of indifference that has been shown toward one of the most fundamental and important elements of our democratic system – our election mechanisms.

 

Election 2000 demonstrated that election administration systems are in dire need of repair.  Antiquated voting machines and ballot systems that confuse the voter illustrate the problem at the most basic level.  In addition, poll worker training issues, reports of differential application of voter ID requirements and other civil rights concerns, purging practices, accuracy problems, standardization and consistency issues – all these point to fundamental and systemic problems.

 

To remedy these problems, the League urges that Congress pass legislation to fix the voting machines, to fix the voter registration rolls and to protect voters.  Voting machines, or voting systems to use the more technical term, must ensure that the voter’s vote will be properly recorded.  Registration rolls with the names of all properly registered voters should be available at the polls.  And we need a variety of systems to ensure that the voter has full access to the polls and to the ballot. 

 

Mr. Chairman, the League supports election reform.  We are disappointed, however, with H.R. 3295, the legislation currently before this committee.  In our view, H.R. 3295 falls short of ensuring that all of America’s voters have a full opportunity to cast their ballots and to have their votes count.  In important respects, H.R. 3295 moves backwards.  That’s why the League of Women Voters, as well as many other civil rights, disability rights, religious and civic groups, oppose the bill as reported by the Committee on House Administration. 

 

Fortunately, the crucial shortcomings in H.R. 3295 can easily be corrected.  I would like to discuss the problems with the bill, and suggest ways of fixing them. 

 

First, H.R. 3295 amends current law to remove existing protections for voters.  Specifically, the legislation amends the National Voter Registration Act in a way that allows citizens to be purged from voter registration rolls if they don't vote.  Key safeguards under current law that protect against errors in election administration would be cut back.  H.R. 3295 as currently written exposes millions of duly registered voters to removal from the rolls.  We believe that the amendment to the National Voter Registration Act should be stricken from the bill. 

 

Second, H.R. 3295 fails to ensure that voters with disabilities have access to the polls just as other American citizens.  That's why a full range of disabilities groups, from the Paralyzed Veterans of America to the American Council of the Blind, opposes the legislation as currently written.  While H.R. 3295 reaffirms that the Americans with Disabilities Act applies in the voting context, it fails to take into account that more than half of all polling places remain inaccessible to voters in wheelchairs despite the provisions of the ADA.  What’s more, the bill allows federal funds to be used to purchase new voting machines that are inaccessible.  The bill needs to be amended to set national standards for accessible voting, with reasonable time frames for compliance.  From our perspective, simply reinforcing the status quo does not qualify as election reform. 

 

Third, H.R. 3295 fails to ensure that citizens can receive a provisional ballot.  This simple reform would provide a special ballot to those who come to the polls but whose names are not on the official registration list.  The ballot would be held aside until election officials can check to see if the individual is eligible and qualified to vote.  Because many jurisdictions have problems getting all registered voters onto their lists in time, this is an important voter protection.  While H.R. 3295 purports to set a minimum standard, it includes a huge loophole that allows the adoption of “an alternative” to provisional ballots.  It also fails to ensure that citizens will be notified whether the provisional ballot is ultimately counted.  These problems could be solved by reworking the language of the bill.

 

Fourth, H.R. 3295 fails to establish a federal minimum standard for America's voting systems.  As a recent report from Caltech and MIT points out, millions of votes are "lost" in each federal election because voting machines and their associated systems fail to properly record the voter’s intent.  H.R. 3295 does not provide for basic standards to protect each voter.  We believe that a vote in Alabama or Alaska, California or Connecticut, should be recorded and counted equally.  We do not advocate a "one size fits all" solution that requires the same machines to be used nationwide.  Rather, basic national standards are needed to ensure consistently low error rates, notice to the voter if she or he has mistakenly miscast a vote by overvoting or undervoting, full access for persons with disabilities or limited English proficiency, and an audit trail.  Representative Conyers has proposed such basic minimum standards for voting systems, and we believe that this common-sense approach should be added to H.R. 3295. 

 

Mr. Chairman, the League of Women Voters has worked for years to protect voter rights.  We have learned that the mechanisms of election administration can be complicated and detailed.  But we have also learned that those mechanisms and those details determine whether each American citizen will have a fair opportunity to participate in our elections and whether every vote will count.

 

The events surrounding the 2000 election exposed many problems that have been festering for years.  Congress should not miss the opportunity to fix these problems.  We urge that the deficiencies in H.R. 3295 be corrected so that real election reform can be passed by Congress and signed by the President.

 

We thank you for your attention, and look forward to working with you on this vital issue.